Thoughts On: “The Four Troublesome Heads” (1898)

Well over a century old and only over a minute long, Un homme de têtes is one of Georges Méliès’s earliest and best-known worksI think the French title literally translates to “a man of heads,” but we know it today as The Four Troublesome Heads. Either way it’s one of your oddly blunt 1890s silent film titles. Classic 1890s cinema, am I right? Haw!

four-troublesome-heads-1The Four Troublesome Heads is a nice intro to Méliès’s talent and goofy sense of humor. I feel like I can show it to almost anyone–the special effects hold up amazingly well and people get a kick out of what an oddball it is. Plus, you can dismiss the usual critique “but it’s so primitive” with “Well doi, it was made at the end of the 19th century!”

Man, just think of that–this was filmed in the 19th century. Everything you see on the screen, the people in the frame, the clothes they’re wearing, the furniture decorating the sets, all of it’s from an era many of us only know from books and posed portraits. It’s reality, preserved for us forever. Victorian cinema never fails to give me a thrill! So with that in mind let’s take a look:

The Four Troublesome Heads is, quite clearly, a one-shot film simply showcasing an “illusion” by Méliès himself. As you know, he was a stage magician for quite a few years and his interest in stage magic really excited him about the possibilities of film. At last, he could perform illusions far more elaborate and surreal than was possible on the stage–such as making talking duplicates of his own head and trying to make them sing. A creative brain, he had.

Nowadays it’s pretty easy to guess the techniques he used. He used substitution splicing, a.k.a. stop-substitutions a.k.a. stop-tricks, every time he takes off his “head.” This meant stopping the camera and placing a dummy head in his hands and what appears to be a dark cloth or bag over his real head. The multiple “heads” were photographed using the wonders of the multiple exposure and split-screen techniques.

Image result for un homme de têtes

Méliès had used substitution splicing earlier in The Vanishing Lady (1896) and the lost The Cabinet of Mephistopheles (1897), but this is his most elaborate use of the effect so far. Other filmmakers, at least George Albert Smith, had also tinkered with these kinds of effects, but Méliès was probably the most fascinated by their many possibilities.

And hands down he had the keenest sense of the fun and wonder of film. In The Four Troublesome Heads he performs with infectious energy, and even his special effects have personality. I love how the three “other heads” happily look around and jabber away. Look at how the two on the left table start chatting with each other–this was very tough to do, since Méliès would’ve had to rewind the film several times to capture his different performances while remembering his exact expressions and movements in the previous few seconds. Remember, this was over two decades before performers such as Buster Keaton would try doing the same thing. Geez, this film is old!!

Image result for un homme de têtes

Do these special effects seem primitive to us today? Does it seem weird to bother asking such an obvious question? Well, sure, but let’s stop and think for a minute. Yes, we can achieve any effect with CGI…but as detailed as it can be, is it always 100% convincing? Do we forget that CGI isn’t real life, or is it often the opposite case? I don’t know about you, but when I look at Méliès’s effects, done entirely in the camera with care and precise timing, I get a little bit more wonder than I do watching the Marvel movies (and I am a big fan of the Marvel movies).

Lastly, here’s another thing I like to think about–when Méliès successfully captured himself interacting with the multiple heads, and was watching the footage of these effects for the first time, can you just imagine how excited he must’ve been?

Image result for un homme de têtes

Note: For some silly reason the IMDb page for this film calls it Four Heads Are Better Than One, which is the title Siegmund Lubin used when he copied it (i.e. stole it) and illegally re-released it in 1903. Méliès would probably rather see it listed as A Man of Heads. 

Sources: 

Fell, John L (ed.). Film Before Griffith. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1983.

Phillips, William H. Film: An Introduction. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1999.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0135696/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “Thoughts On: “The Four Troublesome Heads” (1898)

  1. I showed this film to my class of high school students and they all gasped and laughed when he took his head off. They were not expecting that at all. 🙂 I love your point that even his effects have personality!

    • One of the MANY things to love about the wonderful Melies. I love that you’ve showed this to your high school class, that is awesome!! They’re lucky kids. 😉

  2. When I posted this to facebook, one of my friends replied with “MIND=BLOWN.” I think even to people today, this is an amazing movie. When you think about the work that went into something so simple, it really is incredible that something like this could be made only a few years into the history of film.

    • It stuns me that he was able to achieve such ambitious effects when film was only around for, what, barely 10 years at that point? And was only in the public consciousness for around 3?

      And here people assume films from the 1920s are going to be unbearably primitive (lol).

  3. Reblogged this on hoarding hollywood and commented:
    Méliès’ work should always be in a film class 101 whether in college or high school. I was delighted to read Christina Wehner’s comment that she showed it to her high school class. Tangential Aside: I know of a French teacher who showed her South St. Paul High School French class “The Passion of Jeanne d’Arc” (1928). She wasn’t sure of her class’ attention span, but showed the first 20 minutes. After stopping it at that point, the class clamored to see more. She ended up showing the whole film! It just goes to show you that brilliant classic films stand the test of time—-just like Méliès’ work.

    • Absolutely! And even the oldest films can be appreciated in the same way that we appreciate classic literature. No one complains about not wanting to read Dickens because “his books are too old,” after all. (At least, I hope not!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s