4/9/18, 9:30 pm: As I’m writing this, it’s been a few years since I’ve beheld the 1920s Soviet sci-fi extravaganza Aelita: Queen of Mars. My memories of it are somewhat murky, because truth be told, I fell asleep halfway through it. But! It’s always good to give half-watched films a second chance, and since I have a bit more knowledge of Soviet cinema under my belt right now methinks I shall sit down and behold it once more.
4/10/18, 8:15 am: Darn it, I fell asleep again!
Aelita is somewhat familiar to silent film fans, but mention it to the fabled “regular folks” and you’ll get a “Huh”? It was an ambitious film once meant to rival the masterworks of Germany and the U.S., and while it was popular in the Soviet Union it didn’t seem to make a big splash anywhere else (at least not in the US, where it wasn’t released until 1929). Today, despite nicely-scored restorations being available and occasional photos being shared on social media, it can’t quite climb out of obscurity.
But perhaps that’s understandable. If you google images of Aelita: Queen of Mars, what you’ll get is this:
However, if you actually watch Aelita: Queen of Mars, most of what you’ll see is this:
Which is all well and good, but you’d be forgiven for assuming these are two separate films. Aelita is basically 25% Constructivist avant-garde and 75% meandering Tolstoy novel. As a matter of fact, the film really was based on a Tolstoy novel–a novella by Aleksey N. Tolstoy, that is, not Leo. And it had less to do with space travel and Martians than the glorious goals of the Bolshevik Revolution.
Aelita was filmed by Moscow studio Mezhrabpom-Rus, which at the time was part of the Berlin-based Workers International Relief, founded to help victims of the terrible 1921-23 Russian famine. (Lenin had called for this kind of group largely to compete with the American Relief Administration, which had been sending food to the starving Russians. Err, Lenin interpreted this as trying to embarrass the Bolshevist government.) The studio was generally expected to include propaganda in their work, and in 1923 they decided to film Tolstoy’s novella, revising the plot considerably in favor of depicting Russian life post the 1917-1922 Civil War. So the Martians in this movie are no longer descendants of ancient Atlanteans (which is a pretty darn interesting movie idea right there) and much of the running time is occupied with our Earthy main characters, mainly the daydreaming engineer Los (Nikolai Tsereteli), his wife Natasha (Valentina Kuindzhi), and playboy Ehrlich (Pavel Pol).
Tortured-poet-faced Los’s domestic struggles drive much of the film. He suspects charming Natasha is a little too friendly with the cocky Erlich, a corrupt government worker intent on selling stolen sugar on the black market (have I mentioned this film is from Soviet Russia?). There are also several side plots involving minor characters like Kratsov, who fancies himself a detective and basically provides comic relief.
They’re all decent actors, and the background of crowded Moscow offers intriguing glimpses into Russian society, but let’s be honest: we’re here to see a mid-1920s idea of a Martian civilization. Interestingly enough, the film opens with scenes that call to mind Close Encounters of the Third Kind: a mysterious telegraph message is picked up by receivers around the world, “Anta Odeli Uta.” Los hears it and fantasizes about it being a message from an advanced society on Mars, a planet that obsesses him. He periodically daydreams about these fantastical Martians, who he envisions living in fabulous Constructivist settings.
Yet thanks to the power of Bolshevik propaganda, this world isn’t idealized. Los imagines Mars being ruled by the complexly-garbed king Tuskub and his queen, Aelita. Their worker class is so downtrodden that when they’re done being overworked they’re frozen and put into storage (I think we get the message). Los’s feverish dreams of Mars grow more and more vivid until one day, he decides to blast off to the red planet in his self-designed rocketship (he’s quite the engineer). This doesn’t happen until the last quarter of the film, I must hasten to add.
Here’s where the propaganda really rears its head, to the point where you might chuckle. Los disrupts life in this futurist society forever with a kiss (well, basically) and then encourages the worker class to rebel against the evil capitalists–err, Martian aristocrats. As he preaches to the masses, he tells them this is all just like the October 1917 revolution! And there’s a brief montage of chains being broken and a brawny worker forging a sickle, which he then lays on a table with his hammer proudly on top. Get it? Get it?!
Los then declares, “Follow our example, comrades. Form one working family of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics of Mars.” You can’t make this stuff up.
The rebellion itself, with shots of angry mobs fighting in the great halls of the nobility, calls to mind similar scenes in Metropolis–although the film ultimately has one of those endings. When you watch it, you’ll know what I mean.
I probably don’t have to mention that the costumes and sets end up stealing the show, easily competing with L’Inhumaine or the several eye-popping German Expressionist films for “most modern and daring.” The sets were the creation of Isaac Rabinovich and Victor Simov, and the costumes were designed by Constructivist artist Aleksandra Ekster. The Martian aristocrats’ headdresses, bare arms and robe-like clothing seem to mimic the costumes so often used in epic films like Intolerance, with added “futuristic” twists like plastic sheeting and geometric headpieces. They’re stunningly strange.
Aelita was given a huge marketing campaign in the Soviet Union, to the point where leaflets were even being dropped from planes. But it eventually fell out of favor with the Soviet government, and if you ponder the ending you might discern why. It didn’t help that its director, Jakov Protazanov, had left Russia during the revolution–as had Aelita novel writer Aleksey Tolstoy. This cast suspicion on just how loyal they really were to that ever-paranoid government, and whether their return to Russia was based more on opportunism.
Aelita: Queen of Mars probably will never be called a forgotten masterpiece, especially because of its insistence on meandering through “normal life” subplots. (Hopefully you’ll have more success staying awake through them than I did.) But I’d recommend seeing it, at least once. With its unusual conjunction of early 20th century Russian melodrama–which I wouldn’t have minded seeing just by itself–and operatic futurist design, it gives its own confident definition of the phrase: “not something you see every day.”
[EDIT 11/18/18–I originally categorized Aelita as part of my “Obscure Films” series, but decided to change it one of my “Thoughts On…” reviews. While I don’t generally see a ton of discussions about Aelita among silent fans (which is one of my criteria for marking a silent as more “Obscure” than others), images from it are a little too familiar to fit the film under that label.]
This post was written especially for the Outer Space on Film Blogathon, hosted by the appropriately-named Moon in Gemini. 😉 There are a lot of great, insightful posts this weekend so be sure to check them out! And I want to extend a hearty welcome to all new readers. Feel free to take a look around, and maybe leave a comment or two–I love comments like Charlie Chaplin loved bowler hats.
Pingback: The Outer Space on Film Blogathon is Here! – MOON IN GEMINI
I thoroughly enjoyed your amusing take on the tale. I don’t know if I’ll ever watch it, but I’ll never forget this article.
Well, that one way of AELITA becoming less obscure! 😀 Thanks for stopping by.
Well, one thing is certain… the film can’t possibly be as humorous as your critique of it! Well done, comrade!😂👍🏻
Thank you! These artsy silents provide endless fodder for, shall we say, irreverent material. 😀
Pingback: The Outer Space on Film Blogathon – Day 1 Recap – MOON IN GEMINI
This movie has been on my radar since it is one of the “101 Sci-Fi Movies You Must See Before You Die”. I’m not a fan of blatant propaganda of any sort (either liberal or conservative or even “screw you, lets kill them all”), but I would give it a fair watching the first time, no matter how blatant the propaganda is. I’m still looking for it, however. Nice review.
Yeah, I don’t care for propaganda either, especially from places like the old Soviet Union where we know what the end results were. But I will say that in this case, it’s so hilariously blatant that it almost seems like parody.
No! Say it isn’t so! A Soviet silent film that’s not total genius! (We were taught to worship at the altar of early Soviet filmmakers when I was in film school.)
Your review is deliciously funny. Thanks so much for contributing to the blogathon!
Yes, believe it or not, not every 1920s Soviet film deserves its own pedestal! 😀
And dyou’re so welcome, thanks for hosting!
This movie is a laugh-riot of costume design. I love this movie! I have seen hundreds of silent movies and this is my recommended movie for anyone who wants to see how hard film makers tried to create exotic costumes and fantasy sets. In the context of other 1924 movies, this was a tacky, yet unrefined over-the-top attempt to dazzle the audience. There are lots of other movies that have crazy costumes and sets, but I think this movie does it more-better than any other I can think of. And that is putting aside the plot/political messaging. If you are hard-core silent movie lover, this is a must-see.
I was surprised at some of the non-sci-fi photos you posted from this film. I didn’t know much about it, but I didn’t expect it to be somewhat Tolstoy-esque in nature.
Fascinating background to this film. Not sure if I’ll drop everything to see it right away, but it sounds like one to try, if just once.
I will admit: it’s not forgettable. 😀 Thanks for dropping by!
I believe that many have been deceived for decades and hense the disappointment caused by the film: Aelita is not a scientific drama but a crazy comedy. I laugh with her and her silly protagonist. Who could take nonsense size seriously? You have to laugh.
😀 Not a bad theory, Elisabeth!