Was Chaplin Really That Sentimental?

You see it pretty often on the Interwebs–folks who, usually while embroiled in one of those “Chaplin vs. Keaton” debates, will state that they like Charlie Chaplin well enough, but he’s “too sentimental.” They will then declare their allegiance to Buster Keaton, or else sigh: “They’re both so awesome, I just can’t choose!”

Image result for harold lloyd seated

Harold Lloyd sits patiently on the sidelines, as usual.

While I guess I understand this viewpoint, I scratch my head over it at times–and not just because I feel that Chaplin’s so-called “sentimental” stories are crafted with sincerity and taste. I’d venture a guess that most people today who watch Chaplin tend to focus on his 1920s-and-beyond work, the favorites being The Gold RushCity Lights, and Modern TimesAnd yes, these films are the go-to examples of his much-analyzed use of “pathos.”

Chaplin graph

People can’t get enough of “pathos,” as my scientific graph demonstrates.

But this fabled “sentimental Charlie” we’re familiar with today wasn’t the character that 1910s audiences went crazy over. Quite the opposite, in fact! My friends, if you’re leery of supposed sappiness in Chaplin’s work I must urge you to get acquainted with…Keystone Charlie.

Image result for charlie chaplin keystone gif

Keystone Charlie, or Charlie Chaplin in his earliest films at Keystone, is the very opposite of “pathos.” He thinks nothing of kicking someone through a doorway or slinging bricks at an opponent. He thumbs his nose at bystanders, wanders drunkenly through respectable hotels, and cheerfully sits way too close to annoyed girls in parks. He will, say, comfort a bullied hotdog vendor only to end up stealing one of her hotdogs.

Image result for charlie chaplin keystone gif

Charlie at Keystone in a nutshell.

He’s basically an amoral rogue who ends up obliviously–or intentionally–being a rude pest to everyone he meets. In short, he acts the way any mischievous boy wishes he could behave, and gleefully so.

Image result for charlie chaplin echo park

This was the character that became famous, without a drop of sentiment around. People who know Chaplin mainly from his polite Little Tramp of the impeccably filmed City Lights might be thrown a little for a loop.

It’s useful to know that at the time, it wasn’t unusual for comedians to play annoying bumblers. People acting inappropriately in polite situations was easy fodder for laughs, so just about everyone from Ford Sterling to Billie Ritchie to Roscoe Arbuckle put their stamp on that type of character. What set Chaplin apart was likely his charisma with the camera, his talent for improvising quick gags, and of course, that instantly-recognizable costume.

Image result for charlie chaplin

A bit of background: Chaplin had joined Keystone in 1914, apparently in order to help boost his stage work. By the end of that year, a mere 36 shorts later, he was one of the studio’s most popular funnymen. He then signed a contract with Essanay in 1915, where he released the 15 shorts that made him an official megastar. He then made the move to the much-loved Mutual series of 1916-1917. So even before the world made the leap to calling him an “artist” and a “genius,” he was a household name, so popular that some reporters dubbed society “Chaplin mad.”

At Keystone, Chaplin’s shorts were churned out very quickly, along with the bucketloads of other shorts starring Keystone’s many comedians. While they weren’t always as primitive as many folks assume, there was definitely plenty of slapstick and silly throwaway gags. Since they were often filmed in nearby parks and city streets, they can also be priceless glimpses into a more unpretentious Hollywood.

Related image

Chaplin’s Keystone/Essanay body of work seems less familiar to casual silent comedy fans than his more polished Mutual two-reelers, even though its essential to his stature of one of history’s finest comedians. And there’s so much of it to choose from–there’s arguably much more of this mischievous, amoral Chaplin than there is of the sympathetic Tramp of later years. So when folks complain that Chaplin’s films are “sentimental,” I can’t help thinking, “Well sure, sometimes…but not always!”

Image result for charlie chaplin his trysting place

Exhibit A.

And so, my friends, if you haven’t seen much of Chaplin’s work beyond his ’20s and ’30s films and are quick to write off this master comedian as “too sentimental,” I urge you, check those old shorts out! They show a freer, wilder side of the Tramp, a side that audiences were familiar with long before he even thought to branch out into features. They’re make for excellent study as you track his progress throughout those few, precious years. And of course, they’re simply a lot of wacky and thoroughly unsentimental fun.

By the way, today (April 16th) is Charlie’s birthday! Happy Birthday, King of Comedy!!

Note: All images from Chaplin films made from 1918 onwards are copyright © Roy Export S.A.S.  Charles Chaplin and the Little Tramp are trademarks and/or service marks of Bubbles Inc. S.A. and/or Roy Export.

This post is in honor of the Charlie Chaplin Blogathon, hosted by Little Bits of Classics and Christina Wehner. I’m very happy to be a part of an event that’s paying tribute to the most iconic figure in cinema!

Be sure to check out all the other posts, and if you’re new here, feel free to make yourself at home!

15 thoughts on “Was Chaplin Really That Sentimental?

  1. Pingback: The Charlie Chaplin Blogathon Has Arrived! | Christina Wehner

  2. Excellent analysis of “Keystone Charlie.” As I noted in my review of THE CIRCUS, in the scene where Charlie fantasizes about overpowering his rival in romance, “1928 Charlie” fantasizes about using the same dirty tactics that “Keystone Charlie” wouldn’t have hesitated to use!

    • Yes, that’s a perfect point! It’s as if he’s hearkening back to those days.

      I love how unselfconscious (is that a word?) Keystone Charlie is, compared to his later work. Don’t get me wrong, many of his features are masterpieces, but you can sense him straining to get everything perfect. In these, he’s much looser and does a lot more improvising…it’s a treat!

  3. Excellent point! I might almost say touché, since I have been guilty of applying the word pathos rather too often. 🙂 I once did watch his Essanay and Mutual films in order during several months and did note the apparent anarchy of his earlier films, which gradually wore aware, but never put it together that he became famous first, as you put it, as an “amoral rogue.” That seems so often forgotten a part of his legacy, one I am glad you have reminded me about!

    Thanks so much for adding this great post to the blogathon!

  4. First, I loved the graphic – the math nerd in me rejoiced!
    And I so agree with you! I was kinda shocked when I watched Kids Auto Races at Venice and saw an unsympathetic Chaplin. Only later I learned that he was rougher in his earlier work, and this made me see his evolution with other eyes.
    And, if someone says they prefer Keaton because he’s “cooler”, let’s point out that Keaton laughed a lot in his early shorts from 1917, too!

    • The Chaplin in “Kid Auto Races” is Charlie Chaplin’s best impression of Billie Ritchie. Take some time to watch Billie Ritchie and within a few seconds you’ll see that Ritchie inspired Chaplin. Chaplin stole Ritchie’s character “the tramp”. Billie Ritchie was 13 years older than Chaplin. Chaplin use to refer to Billie Ritchie as “the professor”. The media and corporations invested a lot of money in Chaplin. They marketed Chaplin like mad and did a great job in obscuring Ritchie’s work.

      • Hi Michael, thanks for commenting. I’ve been intrigued by the idea that the “Tramp” character might’ve originated with Ritchie, but there seems to be a lack of hard evidence. We know that Chaplin’s first director, the unpleasant Henry Lehrman, hopped over to L-KO to make what were basically ripoffs of Keystones, and he seems to have hired Ritchie specifically to be a rival to Chaplin. So unless we find new evidence such as 1900s-era stage photos of Ritchie in a tramp costume, it makes more sense to me that he was, indeed, an imitator of sorts although he did put his own spin on his character (Ritchie seems to have had his own mannerisms and such and didn’t simply copy Chaplin).

        Ritchie was a talented comedian in his own right, though–good to know that he has fans!

  5. You said it! When I first saw Charlie in some of those early shorts I was kind of shocked by how rude (but funny) he was. I’m glad you wrote about this sentimental issue – and I loved your chart!

  6. Oh my god, the pathos graph made me laugh out loud. (Harold Lloyd patiently sitting on the sidelines did too). Fantastic analysis, summed up in the absolute most entertaining way as possible.

    Silentology ALWAYS puts a smile on my face and sometimes a tear in my eye! Sometimes at the same time! Just like Charlie!

    I love Tillie’s Punctured Romance which is fascinating seeing him be more part of an ensemble, and sharing the stage with Marie Dresser and Mabel Normand. And being the villain! I should see if you wrote an article about that one, I think you did!

    • Not quite yet, but it’ll be covered one day! It’s an important comedy and it’s survived in nice condition, too.

      Glad I could put a smile on your face, my friend!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s