Thoughts On: “The Musketeers of Pig Alley” (1912)

This post was written especially for the Classic Movie Blog Association’s 2019 spring blogathon, Femme/Homme Fatales of Film Noir. A warm welcome to any new readers–feel free to have a look around Silent-ology!

The first intertitle of The Musketeers of Pig Alley (1912) starts with four words: “New York’s Other Side.” Director D.W. Griffith wouldn’t have realized it at the time, but these words were ushering in the new genre of the “crime drama”–as well as its offspring, the gangster picture and film noir.

Image result for the musketeers of pig alley

The 18-minute Biograph short wasn’t the first to depict crime, of course (a number of early films did, such as A Desperate Encounter Between Burglars And Police, 1905), but it’s the best and earliest surviving prototype of a gangster film. All the familiar notes are there: the introduction to the “dark underbelly” of a city, the charismatic crime leaders, the tough dames, and the crowded, rundown neighborhoods. The hardboiled gang members slinking through deserted alleyways and Lillian Gish’s character giving Elmer Booth a disdainful slap all have their echoes in film noir.

Publicity by Biograph said the film was meant to “show vividly the the doings of the gangster type of people…this picture shows the situation as it is, and the extreme necessity for radical action on the part of the authorities.” Its realism is impressive for its brief running time, with its claustrophobic shots of alleyways thronged with people of all ages, and old tenement buildings where cigarette butts get tossed onto the gritty hallway floors.

Related image

Screengrab by Alex on Film.

“New York’s Other Side” isn’t just that “dark underbelly” of course, but also the honest, working class poor, symbolized here by Lillian Gish (“The Little Lady”) and Walter Miller (her husband “The Musician”). Their apartment is small and plain, but clean, and they struggle to make a living while taking care of the girl’s invalid mother. Both are unjustly affected by the criminal underworld; their plight must’ve resonated with many viewers as they crowded into the nickelodeons.

The Musketeers of Pig Alley is most famous for its shots of the showdown between the rival gangs, particularly the tight closeup of Elmer Booth’s face as he creeps carefully along a brick wall. The framing has a hint of avant-garde that Eisenstein would envy. It’s one of Griffith’s finest parallel-editing sequences, paced slowly, but heavy with building tension.

Elmer Booth in The Musketeers of Pig Alley (1912)

Elmer Booth as the “Snapper Kid” is one of the film’s highlights, already having the tough features and cocky humor of the film gangsters that would appear 20 years later–you can almost hear Cagney’s voice when he talks. Booth passed away in 1915 after being in a car that hit a freight train (the car was driven by Tod Browning); had he lived, he would’ve been cast in Intolerance.

Aside from the performances and sophisticated camerawork (especially for a film made the same year the Titanic went down), The Musketeers of Pig Alley is also a classic for its complexity. Corrupt authorities are apparently a problem along with the gang culture. The Snapper Kid is dangerous but also likable, rescuing “The Little Lady” from an ugly situation. She later prevents his arrest since “one good turn deserves another.” Even the shots of the teeming Pig Alley suggest there are stories there beyond the criminal element, as passersby grumpily jostle each other, a little girl gazes thoughtfully at the camera, and an old man happily peruses a book.

Image result for the musketeers of pig alley

Of the multitude of Biograph shorts–and many of them are classics–The Musketeers of Pig Alley stands out. A must-watch for fans of crime films (or even just film in general), it’s a sophisticated and finely-directed early work that arguably set the stage for the tough-talking Bogarts and Stanwycks to come.

COMING IN APRIL 2019...

 

 

22 thoughts on “Thoughts On: “The Musketeers of Pig Alley” (1912)

  1. A thoughtful account of this famous film. As usual for Griffith, the theme was controversial at the time, as it seems to be saying that the authorities, due to bribery and other means, have allowed dens of iniquity (slums) to thrive in New York. It’s probable that Griffith had read ‘How The Other Half Lives’ by Jacob Riis, among others. The close-ups of the mobsters show ugly, twisted features, then associated then with the criminal Russian and Slavic immigrants. Griffith, of course, was never a racist……..

    • What’s doubly fascinating about Griffith addressing the topics of corruption and gang violence is that the Biograph studio was in NYC, not far from where actual violence was occurring. So he was addressing timely issues that were happening practically in his own neighborhood.

  2. This is an impressive film, especially when it comes to the cinematography. (A previous commenter said it has the feel of an epic, which is true.) When I first saw this film, years ago, I was skeptical going in, thinking it would soft-peddle crime. Was I ever wrong! This is a film that sticks with you.

    • Yes, it does! It’s surprisingly gritty and addresses pretty adult subjects (like the scene of the gangster slipping something into Lillian’s drink–yikes, that is dark).

  3. One of the great things about these blogathons are the many suggestions I get about movies to see, and your post has done that for me. I am very curious to see the street and tenements scenes. Thanks for your post.

  4. It’s hard to pick a favorite Biograph short, but this is among the top contenders! I love Booth’s performance. Such a shame he died young.

  5. I’m not familiar with many of these early shorts, but this one sounds fantastic! A great review and analysis for one of the earliest gangster films. I didn’t realize Elmer Booth’s life was cut short so tragically – what a loss.

    • It’s lucky he happened to appear in one of the most famous shots from early cinema–that closeup of him creeping along the wall. Thanks for reading, Jocelyn–I hope you check this film out! 🙂

  6. Wow, leave it to you to blow my mind yet again, this time about how the Snapper Kid ended up dying in 1915, and would have been in Intolerance.

    Great article, as usual. You don’t get bad articles here on Silentology, let me tell you! 😀

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s